The lesson presented in the 5^th class was an important one that focused on various application programs that can be used in today’s digital world.  Ayushi, Gagan, and Mohammad did an excellent presentation on productivity suites, and presentation tools. The presenters elaborated much on the importance of these tools and how they become essential parts of our lives. In one of the resources shared by the presenters, productivity suites were described as a suite of tools designed to streamline tasks and boost output, including applications for creating documents, databases, graphs, spreadsheets, and presentations. While its core focus is on enhancing efficiency, the term is often expanded to include any software used in our personal and professional lives to assist us in communicating, collaborating, planning, and getting work done. According to the presenters and other existing literature, productivity suites play a pivotal role in enhancing digital literacy and 21st-century skills among students, equipping them for future workforce demands. Voogt and Roblin (2010) described 21st century skills “as an overarching concept for the knowledge, skills, and dispositions citizens need to be able to contribute to the knowledge society” (p. 1).

https://www.icevonline.com/blog/what-are-21st-century-skills

Reflecting on my experience in the use of productivity tools and softwares like Canvas, PowerPoint, Prezi, Animoto, Google documents, and Microsoft Office, and looking at the list of these skills as outlined in the figure below, I can say that indeed using these tools has in one way or another helped me develop essential competencies that are vital in today’s interconnected world. As an educator, I think integrating productivity suites into learning not only facilitates academic growth but also prepares students for real-world challenges. We live in a world where technology has enabled students to become active participants and creators in classrooms. Using productivity suites like word documents PowerPoint, even AI embedded platforms like Dale, and so on is empowering students to become active creators, which in turn helps develop their digital literacy.  As an educator, I have seen students work together on projects and assignments, communicate and collaborate through sending of emails or sharing of documents. All these are characteristics of 21st century skills, and the only way they were able to exhibit this was through the use of these Microsoft tools.  There are also some hands on activities and online platforms that have been tailored for young children to learn so as to establish a foundation for developing their digital skills. Due to the technology-driven environment we find ourselves in, it has become essential that every individual be digitally literate, and this is very essential in addition to the 21st century skills. So even people don’t want to embed themselves in the world of technology; it seems most employers now look for people that can solve problems using basic Microsoft Office programs, which I think can only be developed through productivity suites.

Looking at the gaps they leave, Orta (2019) identified substantial disparities in digital skills among students from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds, emphasizing the importance of equitable access to technology and effective digital teaching methods.In addition, Ramamonjisoa (2024) argued that the use of productivity suites may not fully address the complexities of social-emotional learning and global citizenship, which are vital for the holistic development of students.

Based on this week’s discussion on theories of knowledge and reading “The Nature of Knowledge and the Implications for Teaching by Bates and Bates (2019), I had to do a quick reflection on my secondary school experience as a science student. I recall having a teacher (Mr. A), whose teaching approach made me dislike physics as a subject. Mr A was always objective about his teaching and presented physics as a body of knowledge consisting of facts, formulas, terminology, principles, and theories to be learned. As a result, physics was very boring to me in grade 10 because Mr A would only read out notes without engaging students in hands-on practical, unlike our chemistry teacher. However, in grade 11, a new and fantastic teacher (Mr B) arrived. He engaged us in practical experiments and project activities related to the concepts we learned in class. He often demonstrated activities, encouraged us to make observations and predictions, and then facilitated further discussions or notes on the concepts. We even went on school trips to see how what we learned in class applied to the real world and visited communities to understand how science is embedded in indigenous practices.  Mr B’s teaching style which is aligned with the constructivit approach transformed my perception of physics and inspired me to study physics education at the university. Just like some students, I have always had the misconception that…………

r/meme from reddit.com

based on the experience with Mr. A, who had always been objective in his teaching and sometimes transmissive in his lesson presentation. However, my experience with Mr. B changed this belief and became the inspiration for my own approach as a teacher.

So, if I am to relate Mr B’s approach to this week’s class discussion, I could see elements of constructivism theory in his teaching style, which has also been the foundation of my teaching philosophy.

Mr. B’s approach can be likened to the constructivist theory that posits “learning as an essential social process, requiring communication between learner, teacher, and others” (Bates & Bates, 2019). The theory focuses on students’ active engagement in learning, where teachers build students understanding through thoughtful reflection and analysis. I believe in this Chinese proverb from the Froebel Journal (1967) that says, “What I hear, I forget; what I see, I remember; and what I do, I understand. My interpretation of this expression is that children already have some foundational knowledge of whatever they are being taught based on their surroundings, however, they tend to learn better when they are actively engaged in the teaching process, using experiences from their immediate surroundings to explore concepts taught in the classroom (i.e., learn by doing). However, over the course of my teaching career, I have realised that children are unique in their individual being and tend to learn differently. Hence, the type of approach I use in my class will depend on the topic explored. Nevertheless, I see that the “asking question” component of inquiry learning, which is aligned with the constructivist approach, is a fundamental component of my practice, and it can be adapted to any teaching style.

In the medium article on Skinner’s teaching machine by Abhishek Solanki (2019), the author indicated that the teaching machine is based on Skinner’s belief that “changes in human behavior are a response to external events that occur in the environment”. According to Abishek, Skinner’s teaching machine operated on the principles of operant conditioning (using reward and punishment to modify the development of behaviors) and programmed learning (allowing students to learn step-by-step, ensuring they grasp each concept before moving on to the next), designed to enhance the educational experience by providing individualized instruction (adaptive learning). As a school teacher and a teacher educator, assessment also plays an important role in determining my students learning. I have always found myself using multiple choice questions and fill-in-the blank questions to explore students understanding of what was taught and using their responses to provide feedback.  But, I sometimes feel this does not test the true understanding of students because it is either true or false, right or wrong. These methods do not assess in-depth knowledge and application of concepts taught. However, I have also tried incorporating problem-solving tasks that challenge students thinking and ability to apply concepts taught in practical activities. These activities sometimes require students to research ideas and do presentation in class or sometimes perform experiments in group with little guidance.  I think this approach mirrors the constructivist theory.

Image generated by AI

As an educator, I am required to plan my lessons before going to the classroom. Lesson planning requires the use of various instructional resources that can help guide the selection of appropriate content, tasks, teaching strategies, and feedback mechanisms that teachers can use to enhance learners’ understanding. These instructional resources can include the use of print and non-print materials as well as technology resources.  As an experienced classroom teacher and a science education lecturer, I have had the opportunity to use various hardware, like projectors and laptops, and software, like the Unity app, simulations, and ed apps, in my class. These hardware and software resources encompass a subset of what is called ‘educational technology.”

Reflecting back to how technology was used in my primary and secondary school days, educational technology was more about the use of audio aids (recordings), visual aids (VHS videos) and audiovisual aids (television programs), particularly during special events at schools or in the home. Unfortunately, these technologies did not promote active learning because they were more centred on the presenters (teachers) and the material itself. However, the emergence of modern technologies has provided more opportunity for enhancing the learning and communication process, thereby promoting students active engagement and encouraging personalized learning.

In a simple term, educational technology can refer to the tools, technologies, and resources that can enhance learning experiences. This includes hardware like computers and software like simulations and LMS, as well as emerging technologies like AR and VR (Huang et al., 2019). It’s grounded in educational theories on behavior, cognition, processes, and knowledge construction that are applied in technology development (Ouyang & Stanley, 2014).

References

1. Huang, R., Spector, J. M., & Yang, J. (2019). Educational Technology: A Primer for the 21st. Springer: USA, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6643-7_1
2. Ouyang, J. R., & Stanley, N. (2014). Theories and research in educational technology and distance learning instruction through Blackboard. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 161-172. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1053980