Embracing AI: New Developments in Educational Technology

The introduction of AI into the world of education technology was transformative. I was very hesitant to use it at first. It felt illegal and unprofessional. I was able to work past these feeling through a conversation with a coworker who also used AI to assist in assignment creation. We talked about the fact that AI was more of an idea generator than a free resource generator. Teachers still need to use their professional autonomy to make edits and changes to AI generated work. Once I had established a sense of how to properly use generative AI, I was consistently using it for assignment ideas, creative labs, rubrics for grading assignments, and lesson plans. Additionally, AI as helped me to personalize learning for my students by scaffolding text and creating shorter summaries of lengthy readings.

One of the most time-consuming tasks as a teacher is the creation of lesson plans. Using programs such as magic school AI or chat GPT, I can generate ideas very quickly. This helps to cut planning time, as well as the creation of assignments in half. This helps to free up extra time for other administrative practices such as contacting parents, speaking with students, and additional planning for extracurricular activities.

AI as also helped me to provide more personalize learning opportunities for my students. I utilize AI to scaffold text for students so that they can better understand the class reading material. Many of the articles that I share with my students are written by university scholars. The language used in these articles can be difficult for a large majority of the public to read, never mind students at the grade ten level. AI helps to change the wording of the article so that students are not so intimidated or easily frustrated while reading. This helps to provide high level knowledge at a manageable level for my students. Furthermore, if I need to adjust the reading level further, I can do that for students I think may benefit.

Although AI can help to reduce the planning time for teachers, students are also able to utilize AI for similar processes. Students can utilize AI to create assignments and hand them in as their own work. Therefore, it is vital that teachers help students to understand that the work they are handing in is to be self-created. Teachers can then show students how to utilize AI for feedback on their writing, while avoiding plagiarism. When AI is used as feedback it can help students to strengthen their work by giving them suggestions or pointing out areas that students need to expand on their work. This can help students to gain confidence in the assignments that they are handing in to ensure they are getting the grade they want while completing honest work.

Moving into the future of educational technology, I believe that AI is going to play a large roll. I dream of a day where every student is able to have their own technology that is able to accommodate a wide variety of classes. AI would act as a personal assistant for every student to assist in their learning, not giving students answers, but helping to guide them through questions and problems. This would help to give teachers more time to work one-on-one with students who may require more help or learn in different ways. I dream of a day where AI helps to make teachers more efficient and promote student learning. Our classes are getting larger, with less help in the room. I believe students are not receiving the one-on-one assistance they need to truly strive in their learning and AI of the future can help to lessen that gap.

The Importance of Coding in our Schools

Photo by Jorge Jesus on Pexels.com

Coding is not a new idea in an educational setting. I recall my grade 9 teacher trying his best to teach us how to design code to move a two dimensional rocket across the screen of the brand new Apple 2C computers in our computer lab. Mind you, this was roughly 1986/87 and even the teacher was totally overwhelmed by this prospect. However, the message was the same as today; students will need to know how to do this to be successful in the future.

As for myself, I was not very successful at moving that rocket as I recall, but the exposure to those opportunities helped me and continue to help me as an educator and administrator. I have not directly taught coding but I do realize the importance of these skills. As we saw in the presentation last week and in the readings provided, there are many ways to access and practice these skills. In schools that I have been in, I witnessed the progress our school robotics team made every year, as they designed and programmed their division entries. The kits were provided by the school division so no financial issues ever prevented a team being assembled. The students were of a variety of ages, with senior members teaching younger students and one staff member,( not non techy me), helping whenever a technical question needed to be answered. These were huge opportunities for students that wanted a club that was a little more focused on technology. They took this very seriously, and competitions were intense.

From those experiences, I know of at least one student who has gone on to be nearing completion of his Electrical Engineering degree at the University of Saskatchewan. A huge success story.

Currently, I have one staff member,( there are only a handful of us in total), that directly teaches coding in her classes. They use a version of educational Minecraft to engage students and work on Math skills as well. The resources are easy to find and students find them to be extremely engaging. She uses this approach starting in grade 5.

At my age, I am still learning about how to move that rocket across the screen, just with far better technology, and now by a grade 5 student that tells me ” That’s too simple Mr. P.!”

Digital Assessment Practices: Where are we at?

This past week my group looked at assessment technologies that are becoming more and more prevalent in education. This was also an interesting way to look and reflect on my own assessment practices. Are we just crunching numbers and looking at data on a spreadsheet or are we actually using what we collect in a meaningful way; to help find ways to teach students?

As an administrator, I have to assess data all of the time to ensure my students are getting the best education possible, but there are times where the data does not tell the whole story and I believe this is the same with teachers and students. There is only so much that digital assessment can tell us. We still need to talk with students to see if there understandings go deeper than what is on the page or screen. Some students struggle to use technology but can orally express their knowledge successfully. Classroom settings can cause anxiety as well, so accommodating some students with one on one or quiet areas to work can foster learning for some.

My point is that tools like Kahoot and Socrative are just that; wonderful tools to assist in the assessment of students. They are merely one aspect of assessment, or one tool in the toolbox. Some teachers may become too reliant on this one tool and that is maybe the case for many of the different tools in this regard.

Being balanced in your practices is something that any teacher has ran into. The key is recognizing this and always evolving in this respect.

Assistive Technologies

What technology and/or methods have you used/could you use to make your instruction (whether Face-to-Face, blended, or online) more accessible to your students? This week's presentation helped me to remember that assistive technologies are more than computer programs or devices: "Assistive technology is an umbrella term that refers to any device or system designed to... Continue Reading →

Assessment Technologies

As assessment technologies become more popular in the classroom, it is important that we don’t allow them to dictate our assessment practices away from "good practice." Many digital assessment tools support practices such as multiple choice and true or false questions. Although these forms of assessment are easy to create and even easier to mark,... Continue Reading →

Web 1.0 to Web 3.0 Shaping the Future of Education

The societal view of how students learn within a classroom has not changed much over time. Fourteenth century illustrations depict a professor at the front of the room while students sit within a space and listen. If we entered a classroom today, we would likely find a classroom that is organized like this. However, the way the material is shared, and the type of learning has changed. I am going to unpack how the internet has influenced how students learn.  

Before search engines existed much of the content that was taught in schools revolved around information that was gathered from textbooks. New findings would often take time to make their mark in the world of education as it took time to write and publish the books in which students would learn from. In a way, students were always learning old information. Education during this time placed strong emphasis on reading, memorization, and being able to articulate the information that students were learning in their own words. It was fact based, forcing students to be able to regurgitate information in exams or assignments to prove their understanding of the material.

The introduction of Web 1.0 would also bring with it changes in how information was gathered for the world of education. The first generation of web pages allowed users to search for information and read about it. The owners of these pages would be responsible for updating the information on their pages. These early pages had been referred to as garbage dumps of information. The goal of these sites was to provide users with as much information as possible, often meaning that they were poorly formatted due to inadequate design. However, this provided a much quicker stream for information to be shared than books or encyclopedias. Web 1.0 also allowed educators to connect with students through online mail. This provided the opportunity for teachers to communicate with students in different areas or even other countries.

Photo by MART PRODUCTION on Pexels.com

Web 2.0 advancements in the internet would open the door for collaboration. Improved web design created an opportunity for more people to share their knowledge. Blogs, podcasts, social media to name a few gave people a platform to communicate with the rest of the world. People were able to comment on, listen, and view information rather than write and view read-only material. In the world of education, applications such as Google, Skype, Zoom, Wici pages, and Cloud based document sharing came into play. This presented teachers the option to connect with their students virtually, share information through online platforms, and gave students the option to work collaboratively on assignments at school or from home. Teachers could also place more emphasis on their students to take control of their learning since information was more readily available to them. Additionally, the way that students could provide evidence of their learning also changed. For example, rather than writing an exam on the current topic of study, students could collaborate with other classmates to create a multimedia presentation outlining their learning, and work on it collaboratively from home.

Web 3.0 proposes an interesting shift to a world outside of our own. Advancements such as virtual reality may play a key role in providing learners the opportunity to experience things hands on while still being in the classroom. The introduction of Artificial Intelligence (AI) may provide students the ability to get extra help outside of the classroom, acting as their personal tutor directly related to the material they are learning in school. Teachers can also utilize AI to plan their lessons, adapt material for students, and provide different options for content delivery. In addition, information is available faster than ever and it is essentially accessible from anywhere. This forces teachers to move beyond read and memorize forms of teaching and encourages them to get students to apply their knowledge in different ways.

Photo by Jessica Lewis ud83eudd8b thepaintedsquare on Pexels.com

With all great advancements there are always areas of concern. While the world of Web 3.0 sounds exciting and intriguing. We need to realize that the introduction of Web 3.0 may also be furthering the digital divide that exists within many of our communities. Not all families are able to afford internet packages, let alone a device that allows them to connect. If education is to change as fast as the internet is expanding many students and school divisions may begin to feel the impacts. The lack of funding is going to be one of the largest barriers that education is going to face. Until all students have equal access to technology, the use of these advancements will never be fair. Secondly, the introduction of AI poses a huge risk to the integrity of our education systems. Students can generate written assignments with the click of a button. This makes extra work for educators to ensure that the assignments their students are handing in are legitimate and not AI created. I believe this race between AI and counter AI will be a continual battle, with new platforms reaching the internet on a consistent basis.

Distance and Online Learning; Tools For the Right Time and Place

Photo by Christina Morillo on Pexels.com

As many of us in this class know, COVID accelerated the rate at which many of us integrated online teaching into our careers. There was a mad scramble to create an efficient, EFFECTIVE way to help our students continue to receive an education during a very uncertain period of our lives. There were mistakes made; trial and error, and plenty of frustration for teachers, parents and students. This class helps us to reflect back on the technologies that worked well, and maybe the odd one that frustrated us.

I was a little luckier than some, since in the year previous to the pandemic, I had been given the opportunity to attend PD on technology for educational use. I spent time at a Google Summit in Saskatoon that introduced me to Google Classroom. After that week, I was convinced that this was the way to make education more accessible, and I worked for weeks to set up my online classrooms. They were always evolving, and still are. I have continued to use them in the right situations and I found it depended on the group of students that I would be teaching.

I also added other technologies to my classroom. Kahoot was an app that I tried and I occasionally used it over the years. This year, however, there has been less of an opportunity with the new cell phone policy in place in Saskatchewan. We can use some of these technologies with Chrome books, however, not every classroom has access to that technology either. This is one disadvantage some schools have when it comes to online use of technology.

In my experience there are some limitations to the use of online learning, other than the fact that parts of the province where Wi-Fi is limited. The fact is that many students do not do well in an asynchronous class. Even during Covid, I set up online scheduled meetings for my classes, taught with the use of technology, and still had a low level of success. Our provincial online learning program, the Sask DLC , offers students a wide variety of classes, but since it began a couple of years ago, only 70% of the students I signed up for classes successfully completed their courses. Students that need direct, one on one, instruction are not successful.

Digital Divide

Microsoft dominated the productivity suite market for many years. Throughout my time as a learner and teacher within education, Microsoft was the go-to space for writing and presentation production. However, I personally believe that it was the Covid-19 pandemic that really opened the eyes of those working in education settings to other productivity suites such as Google Workspace, Zoom, and Artificial Intelligence.

I started teaching in the fall of 2018 just before Covid-19 shut down the world. Within the year and a half I spent as a teacher before it became an online practice, I found that students were becoming familiar with utilizing productivity suites at the high school level. The school that I worked in was Microsoft focused and at the time, students were not collaborating on assignments within the given programming. For the most part, students would use Microsoft to complete essays, writing assignments, or presentations using Microsoft Word and PowerPoint. The school still utilized a computer lab with desktop computers, there were also a few laptop carts that could be booked out for work within the classroom.

Moving forward to fall 2020, student learning and the use of productivity suites really began to change. With students being unable to enter the school due to outbreaks, there was another switch to online learning. Platforms such as Zoom, Google Classroom, Google Docs and Slides came to the forefront. These productivity suites allowed teachers to connect with students at home. It also provided teachers the ability to organize their classes in a structured way for students to easily access and follow along. These programs also presented the opportunity for students to collaborate on assignments in real time. This could all be done while still meeting with one another through video call apps such as Zoom or Google Meet. It was an interesting shift in how students were learning.

The transition to online learning forced students and teachers to learn how to use different types of computer programming in a very short amount of time. However, this was not necessarily a bad thing. Employers are often looking for people who are proficient in using current technology and able to pick up new programs quickly. For students who had access to the internet and a computer or a smart phone this was a great learning opportunity.

On the other end of this, there were many students and families that did not have access to a computer or the internet. Working in a community school, this was the reality for many of the students in my classes. Their learning was suffering because of digital divide. I often found myself wondering, why more was not being done for these students. After all, the ability to receive an education is listed as a human right by the United Nations. I often felt as though it was assumed our students would still be able to learn even with the added barriers. For a student with no internet access, learning became thick paper modules to work through. Our school noticed student engagement dropping by the day, and it all could be traced back to digital divide.

Theories of Knowledge

It is vital that educators can adapt to the needs of their learners from class to class, and year to year. This means reflection is an important aspect of education and should be ongoing throughout the year so that the appropriate adjustments can be made. There is no one size fits all answer for how a class should be taught or how information should be presented. Therefore, it is a valuable skill for educators to be able to intertwine multiple teaching strategies within their lessons and determine which ones work best for their individual learners. It is important to note that the teaching strategies chosen by teachers often correlates to their own teaching philosophy, which aligns with the theories of knowledge. Reflecting on my own teaching philosophy I can identify with both the constructivism and connectivism theories of knowledge.

Within the constructivism theory, a main focus is thinking and reflecting. Many of the classes that I teach are subjective, different from science or math. There is opportunity for open discussion and space for students to defend their way of thinking. This process encourages students to bring their prior knowledge with them, reflect on their ways of thinking, and test their ideas through social interaction. I utilize group work and projects with fairly open guidelines to allow students the opportunity to express their learning in different ways while also providing students the opportunity to learn from one another.

Photo by Vanessa Loring on Pexels.com

The second theory that I had identified was connectivism. Siemens states that within the connectivism theory the capacity to know is much more important than what is known. With the internet almost always readily available to students today, it is important that they understand how to read through the information that they are learning and develop a strong digital awareness. The internet also enhances opportunities within the classroom for self-directed study. Many of the curriculums within Saskatchewan have developed outcomes to encourage students to further their learning within classes based on personal interest. Personally, whenever possible I utilize directed studies. This allows students the freedom to choose a topic of their interest under a guiding question or prompt that I give to them. Furthering their research abilities, while also giving them the opportunity to learn about something they have personally chosen. Connectivism also follows the idea that learning and knowledge rests in the diversity of opinions. Technology not only provides students the opportunity to express their work in multiple different ways, it also gives them the option to learn in different ways. For example, some students prefer to watch videos over reading.

Towards the beginning of my career the ideas of connectivism and constructivism were overshadowed by objectivism. The objectivism approach focuses on students being able to comprehend, replicate and justify their answers. My lessons were focused more on objective reasoning, rather than personal opinions. I believe this shift occurred as the classes that I was teaching changed. Moving from mathematics and social sciences to physical education and wildlife studies. Not to say that connectivism and constructivism approaches are not applicable in all classes, however, they are easier to integrate in some more than others.

My Evolving Teaching Philosophies

Over a career, most educators evolve with what works at the time, the subject they teach and the group of students that they teach to. The first word my father-in-law told me to remember when I told him I was going into Education, was “adaptability”. This came from a retired ex-teacher, with 35 years of experience. By the time I reached university as a TC or teacher canditate, I knew how valuable that advice was. This was where I realized the value of students needing to buy in to what we are trying to teach in order for it to be effective teaching. In my opinion, my strongest belief is in the constructionist philosophy. I enjoy designing inquiry projects that allow students to go in directions that interest them. This, I find, not only helps with engagement, but also goes a long way to helping students reach complex thought, where they can express to me what they have learned in a wide variety of ways.

This does not mean that there are not aspects of my teaching that do not represent other philosophies. Any teacher of math or science knows that there are times for lectures, formulas , and equations that have to taught in this objectivist view.

The point I am trying to make is that each teacher probably has one main view and then likely has areas of their teaching in which other philosophies are more prevalent.

Photo by Tracy Le Blanc on Pexels.com

As we head into more new technology every month, it seems, this may alter some teacher’s views on how students learn and therefore how we teach. AI is a perfect example, Constructivists, like myself, see this tech as an opportunity to see how students use it if they are taught how to properly. This is similar to when computers came into schools. Now, they are invaluable.