Well, now that I have got your attention with Sesame Street in the title of my post, let’s start to unpack the big ideas here.
Who would have known that puppets could have such a profound impact on North America in the 1970’s.\? Sesame Street provided a non-traditional approach to education that involved the TV as a morning program geared towards children before they went to school in the morning, or even throughout the day for those not yet of age to attend. The style of education provided a breakout in educational technology through AV devices to reach younger audiences. However, as Postman (1985) suggests Sesame Street created a vision of education that students fell in love with, but this method created tension with the accepted view of traditional education and poked at the cultural epistemological lens of schooling. As a society, we typically are three steps behind questioning the theory of knowledge and what we are valuing at the current time, but are more concerned with the threat of how things have always been done with connection to systems theorem, and its threat to change in our lives.
So, it is clear that as a society we like new, fun, and exciting way to entertain and occupy our time, but as soon it starts to threaten our previous held systems or ideas, we do not like it anymore. However, this might be a poor method for handling change, and it would be perhaps beneficial to start reflecting and questioning the knowledge that is being presented and how it challenges our shared understanding previously. Now that does seem a bit intense and plenty of thought involved. So maybe we are back at the drawing board when it comes to change and epistemology, and not rocking the boat.
If we take this perspective and compare it to a broader scope of AV technologies in the classroom, I think we will see pattern of resistance and lack of questioning of these new technologies in the classroom. It is very interesting to think of the SMARTboard technologies and the vision that they would revolutionize learning in the classroom, yet if we took a closer view into the knowledge that is being valued, and the theory of learning it aligns with best… it does seem there is not much of a gap between a whiteboard and a dry erase marker.
I do think that a new method of viewing technology and AV for instance is thinking more deeply about what style of knowledge are we valuing, and what style of knowledge are we not? And being cognizant of the strengths and weaknesses of each because there will be no technology that will offer both. As well, it is interesting to examine the digital world and the role of AI that creates a more accepted and comfortable view of the concept of Sheeple. Additionally, uncovering and aligning which AV technologies connect with different learning theories will be critical when addressing learning needs in the classroom. Crash Course offers a condensed version of a concept or a historical time-period that can be easily viewed, and as the website suggests, “…is one of the best ways to educate yourself, your classmates, and your family on YouTube”. Once again, I ask myself the question what style of knowledge are we valuing here, who benefits from it, who does not, and what does this method of technology offer more than before? And not for one-second am I saying that Crash Course is bad, or not useful in the classroom, but it is important to examine these bigger questions and their impact on students.
I really liked the article that was posted this week about the Transforming Education through AV technology that echoes our presentation this week from Michael and Graeme. One of the quotes that resonated with me around the power of effective AV. AV itself is not powerful, but how it is utilized and understood is what makes this technology powerful, and yet again this is intrinsically connected to the educator who is using this AV technology. Michael and Graeme emphasized this so well in their video of different educator’s views of technology, and how it was the eductors who really made the learning rich through their use of AV. Therefore, it does feel that as AV and different tech evolve in the classroom, it will need to be the teacher that makes it effective, and that must come through a examine the theories of learning, and the style of knowledge that we are valuing, or not valuing.
Thanks for reading, and please share below if there is a style of AV technology that you have experienced in your career that some people thought would revolutionize the educational world.